.

Thursday, January 3, 2019

The Emperor’s Club

The Emperors Club IQ . Do you approximate professor William Hundred did the de beousness thing? What are the ethical and deterrent example dilemmas would he commence experienced? Did his prize serve up or hinder Sedgwick? A. I believe prof William Hundred did non do the dependable thing. Selecting Sedgwick gong each(prenominal) over Martin prosperous, non on the bases of merit, was non l atomic number 53 well-nigh(prenominal) cheating(prenominal) to Blithe solely cigarette also be perceived as favoritism. It is honest that he wished to see Sedgwick cost succeed and wished to motivate him to work unstateder. However, the elbow room to that end were wrong. Motivating a soul is in truth important.It helps increase boldness and varietys up self-esteem. prof Hundred did his genuinely high hat to encourage Sedgwick to hire himself more in class and at the school. He was quite a successful as healthful. However, Just when it seemed he had finally realized his potential and was on track to accommodate to the final of the Julius Caesar competition, it moody extinct that he would lose expose to Martin Blithe by 1 mark. Professor Hundred thought that this would De-motivate him and further balk his development. In order to keep him cerebrate towards his goal, Professor Hundred decided to ground floor him higher than what he deserved.He thought most what would happen if he didnt select Sedgwick chime. He, however, did non think of the repercussions of his actions on selecting Sedgwick. The implications of his actions on Martin Blithe were non perceived by him at all. The ethical dilemmas are quite clear. Was selecting Sedgwick Bell over Martin Blithe, by changing his grade, the right thing? Did he deserve to be in the final? Selection by all otherwise way other than merit, was it acceptable? When realizing that Sedgwick was victimise, peril his lie or adhere to the headmaster and keep momma few it? The moral areas are a lit tle bit more than want and white.What would be the effect on Sedgwick if he wasnt selected? Given his relation with his father, would he be able to recover later that? Would he give up trying all to bondher post failure? And what ab come to the fore himself? Was he doing the right thing by keeping muteness ab come out of the closet the cheating Just because Sedgwick father was the Senator? And had he failed as a professor, a subscribe to? Professor William Hundred believed his decision would help Sedgwick Bell, to grow, build up his esteem and most importantly, help him earn belief in himself. On the contrary, as we could see, it did not aid him in e genuinely way.By increasing Sedgwick grade, though with the linear perspective of motivating him, was unfair as he did not deserve it. During the competition, on realizing that Sedgwick was cheating, Professor Hundred, on instructions from the headmaster, kept quiet about it. This was his encourage mis aim. This was the second m agazine Sedgwick was given a free accrue without whatever repercussions. This led him to believe that he could tucker through intent, doing what he wanted, in both manner desirable without approach the consequences for his actions. He had no compliances for rules, regulations or authorization. He continued that throughout his life with absolute Gerard to principles.And this holds true, as we see, that up to now afterwards 25 years, he cheats in the competition. later being caught, he doesnt have tear down the slightest bushel about exposure or, for that matter, each contrition. Q. What would you do as a instructor? What would you do as a educatee? A. Contrary to what Sedgwick Bells father mentioned in the movie, I believe it is the Job of the teacher to shed the student and create structure in their life. Coming to SST. Benedict School for Boys, which is an arrangement of sorts, Sedgwick was an internationalr. Professor William Hundred did his very best to welcom e him into the origination.After considerable effort and measure, Sedgwick was make to work hard towards his education. As a teacher, everything Professor Hundred did till thusly was absolutely correct, not unlike what I would have done. In my opinion, motivating students to make themselves, giving them guidance, encouraging them to work harder, basically, mentor them are some of the very inhering qualities of an excellent educator and Professor Hundred, definitely, was one. However, when it came to the Julius Caesar Competition, I would not have done any of the things that the professor id.He seemed to be a very ethical man most of them times. However, when it came to Sedgwick, his morals seemed to be on a wobbly ground. To start off, I would not have changed his grade. It would not wholly be unfair to Martin Blithe, who rightfully belonged to the final, alone to Sedgwick as well. It was true that he tried very hard, his procession was tremendous and he had a effortful r elationship with his father. However, none of these situationors change the fact that he did not deserve to be in the final on the very grounds of merit. Also, when realizing that Sedgwick was cheating,Professor Hundred immediately told the headmaster. The headmaster abandond to let Professor Hundred expose Sedgwick only on the grounds that Sedgwick was the Senators son. If I were in Professor Hunters shoes at that time, I would first try and commute the headmaster that covering up Sedgwick dissembling was wrong and that he must be exposed. If even then the headmaster were to refuse to comply, I would have to call Sedgwick out on his dishonesty. The implications of such an action on my Job would surely hinder me, merely I would expose him, Just because it was the right thing to do.If not then, in confront of the whole school, then surely later. I would make sure Sedgwick deception did not go unpunished. As a student, my only real Job is to try and earn everything around me, t he lessons the knowledge gained from them, in and outside the classrooms and evolve. Basically, all one needs to be is a sponge. Some of the things that help a student evolve are his peers, his friends. Sedgwick did not think practically about them when his reason was come out on something, be it disrupting someones studies or Just having fun, even if it gets them into trouble. I would never take advantage of my friends.I would treat them merely the way I would want to be treated by them. roughly importantly, I would try to learn from them. Temptation is a strong emotion which deters everyones path sometime or another. However, if ones principles are sound, one does not need to worry about locomote from the right path. Cheating, whatever be the chance is wrong. It is not only unethical but it also goes against my beliefs of Just. The guilt of taking soul elses position especially when I did not deserve it would be very strong. I would also not be as callous about my educati on as Sedgwick.A famous and powerful father may get me in any reputable universities but my learning would be compromised. Most importantly, the guilt of cheating and getting away(predicate) with it would surely keep me up at night. There has to be a maven of Justice. The repercussions of my actions must be known to me. Rules and regulations are the building blocks for the development of individual structure. As a teacher, I would work towards portion students realize their potential but in spite of appearance the framework of what is ethically correct. As a student, I would try and embrace the principles, learn and evolve. Q.How would port like Sedgwick impact ecesis behavior? How would Sedgwick like attitude and behavior impact his life? A. Sedgwick Bell had a very strong assertive personality. He had absolute disregard for rules, regulations, principles and authority. In any fundamental lawal setting, such behavior would be very disruptive. His lack of respect for autho rity would make working in a hierarchical environment very difficult. Carrying out assigned tasks and duties reliable from the directly supra echelon would not be done efficaciously or otherwise if there is no everyone from whosoever it has been delegated.He was also very self righteous. such behavioral individualist traits would make it hard to work efficiently deep down the organizational framework. There would be lack of communication, vertically as well as horizontally. Sedgwick failed to think about others as he did not have much concern for others. such(prenominal) behavior in an organization would not help him function well with his colleagues. interaction with people volition help one gain knowledge and grow. Lack of concern for others feelings will not only condition his development, it will make him a Uriah within the organization.All in all, it will affect his mental process capabilities. Within an organization, one functions with a set of goals, short term as wel l as long term. Sedgwick did not have any planned objectives. He did not know, nor did he wish to gain from his time at SST. Benedicts. Such behavior elicit lead to stagnancy within any organization. There will be no scope for growth. Sedgwick, however, when motivated was ready to apply himself and work. Such a quality would be very useful in an organization setting. When motivated enough, an individual would be much more productive.The individual and company goals would be met more quickly and efficiently. What one learns in his early life are some lessons which will shape him for the rest of his life. Sedgwick Bell learned that he could always get ahead without really applying himself and without facing any repercussions for his actions. His disregard for anyone other than himself will make it very difficult for him to lead a happy and successful life. To an outsider he would seem happy and satisfied, but without the respect of others, especially his own family, he will not reall y have utter(a) anything.The first time he cheated in the Julius Caesar competition, he did that as he lacked the confidence to believe that he could actually win. That doesnt take away from the fact that was wrong. However, his attitude that even on being caught he wouldnt be exposed due to the clout his father had is even more troublesome. Such a laid back attitude to rules and a belief that he could get out of any situation will not help him in his life at all. Would he pass on these set to his children, the same way he received them from his own father? In his pro life, he might become very successful, which he does, but at what put down?We see it yet again, that even after 25 years he cheats in the competition. He does so with no remorse and completely discounts the repercussions. The only time he feels any guilt over what he has done is when his son finds out. For a second we are lead to believe, that maybe, there is some hope. Alas, that isnt true. There are ways to get a head in life, but having an soggy attitude towards rules and regulations is not one of them. He might become a Senator, but to really make a difference, he needs to understand people, follow the rules and largely importantly, learn to value principles.

1 comment:

  1. Hi…We offer admission essay writing services, academic essay, and also all your custom academic essay writing. Read more online admission essay

    ReplyDelete