"Ethics Affect Actions".Examines the views of two philosophers (Kant and Mill) on how ethics affect appropriate action. Great for a philosophy class and you can add your own views and opinions

Ethics Affect Actions What is the beguile action? Its a debatable question that is a focal point for moralistic and time-honored code. Morals and ethics is, of course, a subject that runs deep in the debateion of philosophy. People atomic number 18 faced with moral dilemmas everyday, which ofttimes times they decide without thoroughly examining their options. Immanuel Kant and John Stuart hero ar devil philosophers who focus on the topic of ethics, tho with two different outlooks. Kant is considered a non-consequentialist, which means he feels the intentions, motives, and profound leave are nearly(prenominal) important than the results or consequences of an action. On the many other hand, Mill is considered a consequentialist, which means he feels triumph is the ultimate end of humanity. It seems that Kant and Mill would stand opposed on some(prenominal) ethical topics, like the question of meeting with Professor Wagstaff. A student has made a promise to meet with Prof. Wagstaff to converse philosophy, scarce the students friend suddenly falls ill and begs to be taken to the hospital. With urgency of the situation growing, the student then asks himself what he should do. He might ask himself what Kant and Mill feel is the separate action, only when before he can do that we must(prenominal) adequate understand their thoughts on ethics. The backbone of Kants philosophy is the touch in the fundamental freedom of the individual. Kant did not indicate anarchy, notwithstanding kind of the idea of self-government and the creation and obedience of prevalent laws. He believed the moral value of an action is assessed not from the finding of the action, but from the apothegm from which the action springs. He defines a maxim as a personal policy in the cause-effect framework. Kant say that a person should only act on these maxims that could be... --References ! --> This is a well-scripted piece. You did a good job at introducing the subject, although you couldve elaborated a collation on the hypothetical in the introduction, for it is the framework for the essay. two sides are explained well, but I do agree that Kant couldve been explained at more(prenominal) length. The conclusion could use a bit of work, but boilersuit you successfully got your point across. Well done. This was an extreamly well written essay. The essays facts and the writers opinions expire in perfectly to form the idea of on-key writen art. really well done I suggest that the author writes some more information on Kants perspective and doesnt focus so much on Mills. This would give the reader a recrudesce translation of their opposing views. If you want to get a full essay, allege it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper